Fast Answer for Busy Riders β‘ (TL;DR)
The IO HAWK Legend is the overall winner for most riders thanks to its full suspension, serious comfort on bad surfaces, and very capable range wrapped in a still-legal package. It simply makes more rides enjoyable, more of the time.
TRITTBRETT Der neue Paul, on the other hand, suits heavier riders and long-distance commuters who prioritise tank-like build quality, a Bosch powertrain and maximum range security over comfort and compactness. If your streets are mostly smooth and you value "German engineering" vibes above all, Paul remains tempting.
If your daily route includes cobblestones, broken bike lanes or forest shortcuts, choose the Legend. If you ride mostly tarmac, are heavy, and want a rock-solid, low-maintenance mile eater, the Paul still makes sense.
Now let's dig into where each scooter really shines - and where the marketing gloss starts to peel a little.
Electric scooters in Germany used to mean flimsy frames, tiny wheels and the constant suspicion something would rattle off before your second inspection sticker expired. Those days are mostly gone. With TRITTBRETT Der neue Paul and IO HAWK Legend, we're looking at two machines that openly try to replace your car or bike, not just the tram for one lazy summer.
On paper, both promise serious range, high payloads and German eKFV legality. In practice, they take very different routes: Paul goes for industrial rigidity, monster tyres and a Bosch heart but skips suspension entirely. The Legend borrows its skeleton from the Kaabo Mantis, adds proper suspension and premium lights, then politely agrees to stick to the speed limit.
Think of Paul as the stubborn long-distance diesel wagon; the Legend is the SUV that secretly likes trails as much as bike lanes. Which one fits your life better is less about spec sheets and more about how and where you ride - so let's compare them where it counts: on the road, in your hallway and at your bank account.
Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?
Both scooters sit in the upper mid to premium price bracket - the kind of money where you stop saying "toy" and start saying "vehicle" with a straight face. They're street-legal, limited to the same modest top speed, and both target riders who want to commute serious distances rather than just roll to the bakery and back.
TRITTBRETT aims Paul squarely at heavy riders and long-range commuters who are done with wobbly stems, weak motors and tiny batteries. IO HAWK's Legend chases largely the same crowd but adds a twist: real suspension and a chassis with off-road heritage, for people whose routes don't consist entirely of freshly laid asphalt.
They compete because if you walk into a German e-scooter shop with a four-figure budget and ask for "something serious with range", these two will end up in the same conversation every single time.
Design & Build Quality
Holding Der neue Paul by the stem, you immediately get that "solid German appliance" feel. Thick welds, chunky tubing, a deck that looks like it was cut out of a ship's hull, and screws from WΓΌrth - it all screams durability more than elegance. It's functional, sober, industrial. In gunmetal grey, it blends into the urban landscape like a municipal utility vehicle, and that's meant as a compliment.
The Legend, by contrast, looks like it spends weekends at track days. The exposed swingarms, visible springs and hunched "ready to pounce" stance give it a very different vibe. It's less tidy, more mechanical. You see more cables, more moving parts, more "I will need a hex key set at some point in my life". But the chassis feels robust, and the Mantis DNA is obvious: this is a sports frame put on commuter duty.
In terms of materials, both rely on solid aluminium frames and feel miles away from rental scooters. Paul feels like a single solid block once folded and locked; the stem is impressively free of wobble. The Legend's upgraded clamp and safety pin also result in a stiff front end once properly adjusted, but it does have that typical Kaabo trait: if you neglect bolt checks, it will occasionally remind you by developing a rattle or two.
Ergonomically, Paul offers a huge, flat deck - wonderfully simple - while the Legend adds a rear kickplate and a slightly sportier stance. If you like to ride with one foot back, braced under braking, the Legend feels more "active". If you just want a big, uncomplicated platform for your feet, Paul wins.
Bottom line: Paul feels more monolithic and maintenance-averse, the Legend feels more technical and tweakable. One looks engineered to survive years of commuting; the other looks ready for a photo shoot and a forest track in the same afternoon.
Ride Comfort & Handling
This is where they part ways very quickly.
Paul has no mechanical suspension. None. The entire comfort strategy is those big 11-inch tubeless CST tyres, run at sensible pressures. On smooth tarmac and decent bike paths, the result is actually pleasantly plush. The large wheel diameter rolls calmly over cracks and smaller potholes, and the scooter feels stable and grown-up. After a moderate commute entirely on asphalt, my knees were perfectly happy.
Then you hit old-town cobblestones or patched-up cycle lanes, and reality bites. The fat tyres take the edge off, but deep joints and sharp edges transmit straight into your legs and lower back. Over a short stretch, it's fine. Over a few kilometres of bad surfaces, you start mentally composing a letter to Trittbrett about springs.
The Legend is the opposite approach: full suspension front and rear, plus 10-inch pneumatics. On broken asphalt, tram tracks and cobbles, it simply glides in comparison. You still feel the texture of the road, but the harsh vertical punches are smoothed out before they hit your spine. After several kilometres of ugly pavement, I stepped off the Legend relaxed; on Paul, I stepped off and did the little "old man stretch" whether I liked it or not.
Handling-wise, Paul is very stable and predictable. The wide handlebars and long wheelbase make it feel like a freight train on rails at legal speeds. Quick changes of direction are fine, but you always feel the mass and the long deck - it's more cruiser than carver.
The Legend feels livelier. The suspension lets it settle mid-corner, and the slightly smaller wheels make it quicker to lean. On a twisty cycle path, the Legend invites you to pick lines, lean, and play. Paul asks you to relax, stand square, and cruise.
If your daily route is mostly clean tarmac, both are comfortable enough. Add "historic" paving, tree roots and the odd curb, and the Legend's suspension isn't just a nice-to-have - it becomes the difference between arriving fresh and arriving slightly rattled.
Performance
Both scooters are shackled by the same legal top speed, so the interesting part is how they get there - and what happens on hills.
Paul's Bosch rear motor feels strong and extremely composed. It doesn't lunge; it just builds speed with quiet authority. Even towards the end of the battery, it still pulls with the same calm determination, which is reassuring on longer days. On steep ramps and bridges, Paul behaves like that diesel wagon again: plenty of torque, no drama, just a steady climb without begging you to kick along.
The Legend's geared motor has a very different character. There's a distinct mechanical whine and more of a shove off the line if you set the acceleration to the aggressive mode. It snaps up to its limited speed a touch quicker, especially noticeable if you're heavier or carrying a load. On short, nasty hills that make smaller scooters die of embarrassment, the Legend just churns up with tractor-like stubbornness.
In pure hill-climbing, both are genuinely capable. Paul leans on that Bosch torque curve, the Legend on its gear reduction. The practical difference? Paul does it quietly and smoothly; the Legend does it with more audible drama and a slightly more urgent feel at the throttle.
Braking is where Paul clearly flexes. Dual hydraulic discs combined with strong motor braking and e-ABS give you one-finger power and excellent modulation. Emergency stops feel composed, and the lever feel is what you expect at this price: firm, precise, confidence-inspiring. The Legend's mechanical discs do stop the scooter well, especially with e-ABS helping out, but they need more hand force and occasional adjustment to stay sharp. After riding Paul, switching back to the Legend feels a tad "budget" at the levers, even if the actual stopping distance is still decent.
At their limited top speeds, both are very stable. Paul feels like it's barely waking up; the Legend feels hilariously overbuilt, given the frame was originally designed to go three times as fast in other markets. Neither flinches at full speed, even in mild crosswinds.
Battery & Range
Both scooters play the "no range anxiety" game, and both play it well - just in slightly different flavours.
With the larger battery option, Paul is firmly in long-haul territory. In real-world, mixed riding with full power most of the time, you can comfortably plan for commutes that would leave typical rental-style scooters crying for a charger halfway through. Ride more sensibly, and you're in "two, maybe three days between charges" territory for typical urban distances. The Bosch motor and LG cells are also frugal; you feel like the scooter is reluctant to let go of those last bars.
The Legend's pack is only slightly smaller on paper and behaves similarly in practice. Hammering around at full legal speed, taking a few hills and enjoying that suspension, you still get very respectable distances per charge. Dial the pace back a notch and you also enter the "I'm charging every few days, not every day" zone. Regen braking on both helps a little in hilly cities; it's not magic, but over a week you do notice the difference.
Charging is where patience is required with both. Paul's bigger battery will happily occupy a wall socket for most of a working day if you run it low. The Legend isn't much quicker with a single charger, but its dual charging ports are a genuine advantage if you invest in a second brick - then you're back on the road far sooner.
Range anxiety? On either, not really, unless your idea of "commute" is a weekend-tour level of distance. But if you're the sort who deliberately stacks long rides and hates thinking about chargers, Paul's larger pack still holds a small overall edge.
Portability & Practicality
Let's be blunt: neither of these is "throw it over your shoulder and jog up three flights" material.
Paul is heavy and bulky. Folded, it's a big metal plank with wheels. The folding mechanism itself is reassuringly solid and simple enough to operate, but once it's locked down you're lifting something that feels more like a compact moped than a scooter. If you have an elevator or ground-floor storage, fine. If not, you will quickly learn exactly how much a couple of dozen kilos feel at the end of the day.
The Legend is marginally lighter on paper, but in real life they both live in the same "I regret my staircase" category. The folding mechanism is a bit fussier at first - that clamp can be stiff out of the box - but once you get the hang of it, the scooter folds reasonably compactly and fits better into typical car boots than Paul, thanks to slightly slimmer dimensions and folding handlebars. Carrying it is still a two-hand, plan-your-grip affair.
For everyday practicality on the ground, Paul's wide deck and built-like-a-tank kickstand make living with it easy. Park it, forget it, it's not going to topple over if someone coughs near it. The Legend's kickstand is also sturdy, but the lean angle and foot size mean soft ground and awkward pavements need a bit more attention.
In trains and lifts, both are socially sub-optimal in rush hour. The Legend's slightly more compact folded footprint gives it a small edge if you absolutely must go multimodal, but honestly, these are both "door to door" vehicles more than "last mile" toys.
Safety
On safety, both brands clearly took things seriously, but they made different bets.
Paul's trump cards are braking and water protection. Those hydraulic discs plus strong motor braking and electronic anti-lock logic give a level of braking confidence many scooters in this class simply don't match. Add large, grippy tubeless tyres and high overall stability, and you feel very secure in emergency situations. The IP65/IP67 protection adds peace of mind for year-round commuters; getting caught in rain with Paul feels more like a minor inconvenience than a system test.
The lighting is good enough for city riding, with integrated indicators that finally make hand signals optional. The main headlight, however, is just about adequate for darker, unlit routes - usable, but not "forget auxiliary lights exist" good.
The Legend goes all-in on visibility. The Kellermann indicators are honestly overkill in the best possible way. Drivers notice them. Cyclists notice them. People on balconies notice them. Combined with a strong headlight, you're not just legal, you genuinely stand out at night. That's rare for scooters.
Braking is solid but less premium-feeling than Paul's setup. The combination of mechanical discs and eABS will stop you quickly, but lever feel and maintenance burden pull it down a notch. Tyre grip is excellent, especially with the option to choose between street and off-road rubber.
In stability terms, both frames are vastly overbuilt for their limited top speed. The Legend's suspension adds a safety layer on bad surfaces; a wheel that stays glued to the ground under braking is a wheel that can keep gripping. On truly rough paths or wet cobblestones, that makes a noticeable real-world difference.
Community Feedback
| TRITTBRETT Der neue Paul | IO HAWK Legend |
|---|---|
What riders love
|
What riders love
|
What riders complain about
|
What riders complain about
|
Price & Value
Both scooters sit safely above the impulse-buy zone. Once you cross into this bracket, you start expecting not just decent parts, but coherence and longevity.
Paul's value pitch rests on its premium powertrain, long-range battery options, and ultra-solid build. You are effectively paying for the Bosch logo, LG cells, hydraulic brakes and a frame that shrugs at heavy riders. If you rack up serious yearly mileage and keep scooters for a long time, that investment is easier to justify. If you're a lighter rider doing modest daily trips on decent infrastructure, Paul can feel like paying for capability you'll never actually exploit - especially given the lack of suspension.
The Legend charges a similar sum but spends more of it on ride experience: full suspension, premium indicators, dual charging, and a proven performance chassis. Spec-for-spec against anonymous imports, it doesn't look cheap, but you're buying legality, tuning potential and a more entertaining daily ride. For riders who prioritise comfort and "fun per kilometre" over outright efficiency, the Legend's value proposition is stronger.
Service & Parts Availability
Both brands are German-based, both have established footprints, and both are far better bets than no-name imports when something eventually wears out - which it will.
TRITTBRETT enjoys a solid reputation for support and parts availability. Being built around widely used components (Bosch, LG, Zoom etc.) makes sourcing replacements more straightforward, and Paul's relatively simple, unsuspended design means fewer moving parts that can fail. For people who want to ride, not wrench, that simplicity is worth something.
IO HAWK has strong brand recognition and an active community, but feedback on service can be mixed: some report excellent help, others complain about slow responses and delays during busy periods. On the upside, the Legend's Kaabo roots mean a healthy ecosystem of compatible parts and upgrades, from tyres to suspension components.
If your ideal relationship with your scooter is "just annual check-ups and the occasional tyre", Paul's simpler structure and stable support tilt the scales. If you're happy to tinker and lean on the vibrant Legend/Kaabo community, IO HAWK's ecosystem is richer - but also more demanding of your time.
Pros & Cons Summary
| TRITTBRETT Der neue Paul | IO HAWK Legend |
|---|---|
Pros
|
Pros
|
Cons
|
Cons
|
Parameters Comparison
| Parameter | TRITTBRETT Der neue Paul (19,6 Ah) | IO HAWK Legend |
|---|---|---|
| Motor rated power | 500 W Bosch rear hub | 500 W geared rear motor |
| Peak power (approx.) | 1.200 W | ca. 700-800 W |
| Top speed (legal) | 20 km/h (DE), 25 km/h (AT) | 20 km/h (DE) |
| Battery capacity | 48 V 19,6 Ah (ca. 940 Wh) | 48 V 18,2 Ah (ca. 874 Wh) |
| Claimed max range | bis ca. 95 km | bis ca. 87 km |
| Realistic range (mixed) | ca. 50-65 km | ca. 50-60 km |
| Weight | ca. 25,1 kg | ca. 24,3 kg |
| Max load | 150 kg | 120 kg |
| Brakes | Dual hydraulic discs + motor brake, e-ABS | Dual mechanical discs + eABS / regen |
| Suspension | Keine (nur Luftreifen) | Vorne und hinten Federung |
| Tyres | 11 Zoll CST tubeless, Luft | 10 Zoll Luftreifen (Street oder Offroad) |
| Water protection | IP65 Scooter / IP67 Motor | Spritzwasserschutz, keine offizielle hohe IP |
| Charging time (standard) | ca. 5-6 Stunden | ca. 6-8 Stunden (halbierbar mit 2. LadegerΓ€t) |
| Price (typical) | ca. 1.399 β¬ (19,6 Ah) | ca. 1.374 β¬ |
Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?
If I had to commute daily through a typical German city - which invariably means patched asphalt, random cobbles and the occasional "shortcut" through a park - I'd take the IO HAWK Legend. The suspension simply changes the game. It turns routes that are borderline punishment on rigid scooters into something you actually look forward to riding. Add the excellent lighting and solid range, and it feels like a genuinely complete all-rounder for everyday use.
TRITTBRETT Der neue Paul, however, still has a clear audience. If you're a heavier rider who has chewed through lesser scooters, or your route is long but relatively smooth, Paul's combination of Bosch motor, big battery, hydraulic brakes and stout frame is very compelling. You trade away comfort on rough surfaces and manageable weight for range security and a slightly more "appliance-like" ownership experience.
In short: choose the Legend if your priority is comfort and enjoyment over mixed terrain and you don't mind a bit of maintenance. Choose Paul if you are heavy, ride far on mostly decent tarmac, and want a scootery tank that just keeps going, even if it occasionally reminds your knees who's boss.
Numbers Freaks Corner
| Metric | TRITTBRETT Der neue Paul | IO HAWK Legend |
|---|---|---|
| Price per Wh (β¬/Wh) | β 1,49 β¬/Wh | β 1,57 β¬/Wh |
| Price per km/h of top speed (β¬/km/h) | β 69,95 β¬/km/h | β 68,70 β¬/km/h |
| Weight per Wh (g/Wh) | β 26,70 g/Wh | β 27,81 g/Wh |
| Weight per km/h (kg/km/h) | β 1,26 kg/km/h | β 1,22 kg/km/h |
| Price per km of real-world range (β¬/km) | β 24,33 β¬/km | β 24,98 β¬/km |
| Weight per km of real-world range (kg/km) | Weight per km of real-world range (kg/km)β 0,44 kg/km | β 0,44 kg/km |
| Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) | β 16,35 Wh/km | β 15,89 Wh/km |
| Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) | β 60,00 W/km/h | β 40,00 W/km/h |
| Weight to power ratio (kg/W) | β 0,02 kg/W | β 0,03 kg/W |
| Average charging speed (W) | β 170,90 W | β 124,90 W |
These metrics try to strip emotion out and look purely at efficiency and "how much you get per euro, per kilo, per watt". Price per Wh and per km tell you how affordably each scooter turns money into battery and real-world distance. Weight-related values hint at how much mass you move around for a given range or power. Efficiency in Wh/km shows how gently they sip from their packs. Power-to-speed and weight-to-power ratios indicate how strongly each scooter can push relative to its top speed and heft. Charging speed simply reflects how quickly you can get that stored energy back.
Author's Category Battle
| Category | TRITTBRETT Der neue Paul | IO HAWK Legend |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | β Slightly heavier, bulkier feel | β Marginally lighter, better balance |
| Range | β Bigger pack, more headroom | β Slightly less total range |
| Max Speed | β Same limit, feels calmer | β Same limit, more drama |
| Power | β Strong peak, quiet push | β Punchy but less overhead |
| Battery Size | β Larger capacity option | β Slightly smaller battery |
| Suspension | β None, tyres only | β Real front and rear |
| Design | β Functional, utilitarian charm only | β Aggressive, industrial chic |
| Safety | β Strong brakes, water sealing | β Weaker brakes, less sealing |
| Practicality | β Simple, low-maintenance layout | β More moving parts, care |
| Comfort | β Harsh on bad roads | β Plush, "flying carpet" feel |
| Features | β Fair, but nothing exotic | β Suspension, dual charge, USB |
| Serviceability | β Simpler, fewer moving bits | β Suspension adds complexity |
| Customer Support | β Generally steady reputation | β Mixed feedback on speed |
| Fun Factor | β Serious, a bit sober | β Playful, invites exploring |
| Build Quality | β Tank-like, minimal wobble | β Good, but needs tightening |
| Component Quality | β Bosch, LG, WΓΌrth, hydraulics | β Mixed, mechanical brakes |
| Brand Name | β Solid, serious commuter focus | β More "scene", less sober |
| Community | β Smaller but positive | β Big, active, mod-friendly |
| Lights (visibility) | β Good, but not standout | β Kellermann indicators shine |
| Lights (illumination) | β Adequate for city only | β Stronger beam for dark paths |
| Acceleration | β Smooth but less exciting | β Punchier, more responsive |
| Arrive with smile factor | β Competent, not thrilling | β Often makes you detour |
| Arrive relaxed factor | β Rough roads tire you | β Suspension saves your body |
| Charging speed | β Faster per Wh, simple | β Slower unless dual chargers |
| Reliability | β Fewer parts to go wrong | β More wear points, tuning |
| Folded practicality | β Bulky footprint, long deck | β More compact, folding bar |
| Ease of transport | β Heavy, awkward to carry | β Still heavy, but easier |
| Handling | β Stable but a bit dull | β Agile, encourages carving |
| Braking performance | β Hydraulic, strong, consistent | β Mechanical, more effort |
| Riding position | β Upright, very relaxed | β Slightly more aggressive |
| Handlebar quality | β Wide, solid, ergonomic | β Good, but more flex |
| Throttle response | β Smooth but a bit tame | β Adjustable, more character |
| Dashboard/Display | β Functional, nothing special | β More info, voltmeter, USB |
| Security (locking) | β No real extras | β Key / NFC ignition |
| Weather protection | β Strong IP rating, good fenders | β Decent, but less robust |
| Resale value | β Strong in commuter circles | β Strong in enthusiast scene |
| Tuning potential | β Limited, law-focused setup | β Huge, Mantis ecosystem |
| Ease of maintenance | β Simple, unsuspended frame | β Suspension and more bolts |
| Value for Money | β Great if you use all of it | β Better mix of joy and utility |
Overall Winner Declaration
In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the TRITTBRETT Der neue Paul scores 7 points against the IO HAWK Legend's 4. In the Author's Category Battle, the TRITTBRETT Der neue Paul gets 19 β versus 21 β for IO HAWK Legend.
Totals: TRITTBRETT Der neue Paul scores 26, IO HAWK Legend scores 25.
Based on the scoring, the TRITTBRETT Der neue Paul is our overall winner. When you step back from the spreadsheets and think about which scooter you'd actually want to ride every single day, the IO HAWK Legend feels like the more complete companion. It may demand a bit more care and tolerance for quirks, but it pays you back with comfort, character and that subtle urge to take the long way home. TRITTBRETT Der neue Paul remains a rock-solid choice if you're heavy, ride far and value indestructible feeling hardware over entertainment. But if you want each commute to feel less like a duty and more like a small adventure, the Legend simply makes you look forward to pressing the throttle a little more.
That's our verdict when we try to stay objective β but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.

